Mcmillan Mcgee

Simulating cylindrical induction heaters with helical electrical conductors

Industry Mentor: Edwin Reid, Director of Electrical Technology, McMillan-McGee Corporation

Brief Description of the Problem

Here is a brief description of McMillan-McGee’s (MC2) patented induction heaters used for thermal conductive remediation of contaminated soil. Without delving into the science of soil remediation, which is beyond the scope of work, it is sufficient to say that a heater unit consist of a hollow steel cylinder that is equipped with an internal electrically conducting helix that runs inside the lateral extent of the cylinder. The cylinder, called the casing, is a 6-inch inner diameter carbon steel pipe, with wall thickness from 1/4 to 1/2 inch. The helix, called the work coil, is made from a very long piece of copper or nickle bus bar stock with a rectangular cross section 1/4 inch thick by 1 inch wide. A stainless steel frame frame supports the work coil on ceramic insulators that electrically isolate the work coil from both the frame and casing. The heater unit is essentially a transformer where the work coil is the primary, and the casing, the secondary. In this construction, the casing forms a single-turn short circuited secondary. Heater units can have a length from one to ten meters and these are buried vertically below ground level in a volume of soil to be decontaminated. Intense heat is usually needed to mobilize contaminants trapped in the soil in order that these can be extracted and disposed by certain processing equipment. A typical field installation consists of a multitude of heaters, which are spaced a few meters apart and arranged in a repeated triangular pattern. Heat is transferred from heaters to the volume of soil solely by thermal conduction.

The purpose of the work coil is to induce circumferential eddy currents on the inner wall of the casing. These currents flow against the resistance of the casing thereby generating heat, whereby, the casing transfers its heat to the soil. Induction heating is not a new technology, which has been used in foundries since 1910; however, it is a new technology to the soil remediation industry. In light of this McMillan-McGee Corporation have developed heaters and an electronic generator, called an inverter, which supplies high frequency alternating current to the work coil.

The inverter accepts three-phase 60 Hz low voltage (up to 600 volts is considered to be low voltage in the power system trade) current drawn from the utility, converts this to direct current with a rectifier, then regenerates the current at a much higher frequency. This is exactly what Danfoss variable frequency drives do; however, our inverters supply current to work coils at a much higher frequency. Our inverters can supply alternating current to work coils over the frequency range 7.5 kHz to 15 kHz. Work coil current is typically 80 to 100 Amperes and up to 50 kW can be drawn from one inverter. The purpose for the high frequency is two-fold: first, the work coil is constructed from bus bar stock which has an appreciable pitch thereby resulting in a low mutual inductance. The work coil looks like a barber poll. In order to induce significant voltage on the wall of the casing using a work coil with low mutual inductance will require a high frequency; this is by virtue of Faraday’s law. Secondly, the wall of the pipe is very thick so operating on low frequencies result in current occupying the entire wall thickness thereby forming an extremely low resistance, thus a short circuit. The steel casing does have appreciable resistivity and magnetic permeability which can be used to an advantage under certain operational conditions in order to establish appreciable resistance against eddy currents to generate heat. One way is to limit the depth of penetration of current in the wall of the casing by exploiting the so called skin effect. To do this will require operating on a sufficiently high frequency,, which is by virtue of the skin effect. It is important to bear in mind that the internal temperature of the heater can reach above 800C; and as such, the electrical and magnetic properties of the heater unit will change with temperature. Thus, the problem itself is inherently a function of temperature. Therefore, specification of material parameters is subject to their operating temperature. In light of this, we can still treat this problem as a constant temperature one as long as we specify the heater temperature.

We seek is a reasonably accurate and affordable design tool as stated in the above paragraph. Certainly, finite element simulators such as Comsol Multi-Physics and others can be used to tackle this problem, but these impose two burdens: first simulators are expensive; secondly they are time and computer memory intensive when analyzing practical problems. There may be free software available, but much work is needed to adapt them to suit our purpose. Therefore I am looking for a closed form solution that can be executed with a Matlab to deliver timely and accurate results.

Why is the problem of interest?

I am often asked to assess the feasibility and associated cost on using different heater lengths, diameters, and materials for prospective clients. The results of analysis using a good design tool would be useful to support my assessment comments. Presently, I comment with reservation, unless backed by experimental results. Often responses are called for which must be handled in a short time frame. In light of this, I would like assistance in further developing the work in John Young’s Journal paper that was published in the IEEE 1 almost two decades ago. A similar approach is also found in a IEEE technical monogram 2. Both approaches construct a good model of the problem and apply will known mathematical methods to arrive at a solution which can easily coded in Matlab and rapidly executed on a computer. I favor these approach and would like to extend the work to include the effect of Joule heating on the casing. I have started working on developing a solution but have not reached one that . I’m satisfied with because it lacks rigor.

What kinds of data are available?

Experimental data for different heater lengths is currently available. Also, my treatment of this problem by an elementary approach, which apparently works.

What would a solution to the problem look like?

The solution would be in the form of a Thevenin equivalent circuit (series connected resistor and inductor) for a work coil in casing. The problem can be simplified when we relax the wave propagation requirement, thus reducing the solution to one representing diffusion

What background knowledge would be needed

A good working knowledge of Maxwells equations 3. Vector Analysis, Boundary Value Problems 4, Green’s Functions. Fluency in Complex Variables, Contour Integration, Residues, Integral Transforms, and differential equations.

References


  1. John C. Young and Chambers M. Butler, Inductance of a Shielded Coil, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 49, No. 6, June 2001 ↩︎

  2. Donald G. Dudley, Mathematical Foundations for Electromagnetic Theory, IEEE Press, 1994 ↩︎

  3. Dale Corson and Paul Lorrain, Electromagnetic Fields and Waves, W.H. Freeman and Company, 1962 ↩︎

  4. Hans Sagan, Boundary and Eigenvalue Problems in Mathematical Physics, Dover Publications Inc. 1961 ↩︎

Edwin Reid
Edwin Reid
Director of ELectrical Technology
Yakine Bahri
Yakine Bahri
Instructor
Ryan Thiessen
Ryan Thiessen
GRADUATE STUDENT
Noah Bolohan
Noah Bolohan
Recent Graduate Student
Alireza Yazdani
Alireza Yazdani
Graduate Student
Benjamin MacAdam
Benjamin MacAdam
PhD Candidate at the University of Calgary

Related